Author: Uri Blass
Date: 02:03:13 01/04/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 04, 2002 at 03:47:06, Steffen Jakob wrote: >Another position which Hossa doesn't solve according to my wac.epd file: WAC >#235 > >[D]5r2/1p1RRrk1/4Qq1p/1PP3p1/8/4B3/1b3P1P/6K1 w - - > >The key moves are Qxf7 and Rxf7. Hossa instead plays 1.Qe4 with something like >+4. Dann? :-) > >Greetings, >Steffen. Yes Qe4 is also a winning move here My stupid program also plays Qe4 but I think that programs should play Qxf7 or Rxf7 because they are the most simple way to win the game. My program's score after finising iteration 10 is only 2.34 but I guess that it is not searching deep enough. main line e6e4 g7g8 e7f7 f8f7 e4b7 f7d7 b7d7 f6g7 d7g7 b2g7 b5b6 b5b6 After Rxf7+ Rxf7 Qxf7+ Qxf7 c6 that is 3 plies from my program point of view my program says: depth 8 score -1.34 depth 9 score -3.48 depth 10 score -4.39 depth 11 score -4.59 It means that my program probably needs at least depth 12 to find 1.Rxf7+ or 1.Qxf7+ and it may take it some hours. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.