Author: Marc van Hal
Date: 09:47:46 01/04/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 04, 2002 at 05:19:52, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On January 03, 2002 at 22:30:59, James T. Walker wrote: > >>Checked for what? >>They may be checked to insure the line does not contain a blunder but do you >>think they can check 40K variations to insure that Rebel will "understand" the >>position it ends up in? > >Sure. Not all the lines have to be checked. A bookbuilder with experience >will quickly have a feel what the program does and does not understand. > >Also, 10 years of man work is a lot. > >-- >GCP If you looked at my postings I even said that the Rebel openings book somes end in the position wich not only rebel but not any program does understand. And said it would be beter to give more moves in the book so it does understand the position from where it has to start calculating moves. And for the human sight of vieuw even more moves where necasery. I later on also said that no mather this he did do a prety good job (only a pitty for some gaps he left open. ) About the Schredder6 games Schredder has to play with the Schredder6 and not the Junior7 book The product came in this way on the market So bey using an other openingsbook the customers gets wrong information about the product they bought I am prety sure Stephan would agree with this Regards Marc van Hal
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.