Author: Uri Blass
Date: 11:59:58 01/04/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 04, 2002 at 12:47:46, Marc van Hal wrote: >On January 04, 2002 at 05:19:52, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>On January 03, 2002 at 22:30:59, James T. Walker wrote: >> >>>Checked for what? >>>They may be checked to insure the line does not contain a blunder but do you >>>think they can check 40K variations to insure that Rebel will "understand" the >>>position it ends up in? >> >>Sure. Not all the lines have to be checked. A bookbuilder with experience >>will quickly have a feel what the program does and does not understand. >> >>Also, 10 years of man work is a lot. >> >>-- >>GCP > > >If you looked at my postings I even said that the Rebel openings book somes end >in the position wich not only rebel but not any program does understand. >And said it would be beter to give more moves in the book so it does understand >the position from where it has to start calculating moves. >And for the human sight of vieuw even more moves where necasery. >I later on also said that no mather this he did do a prety good job (only a >pitty for some gaps he left open. ) >About the Schredder6 games Schredder has to play with the Schredder6 and not the >Junior7 book >The product came in this way on the market >So bey using an other openingsbook the customers gets wrong information about >the product they bought >I am prety sure Stephan would agree with this > >Regards Marc van Hal Shredder does not have to play with it's book and I see no problem with the fact that shredder plays with Junior book when it was mentioned. Shredder also lost against tiger when tiger used Fritz's book. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.