Author: Thomas Mayer
Date: 13:18:23 01/04/02
Go up one level in this thread
Hi Robert, > In your example above, where does the 40M number come from? Does it assume 5 > man TBs?, because I would assume that this number would have to go up as the > TB file size goes up too... Or is this not the case? 40M are needed for one of those 5 men tablebase, I don't know which one... it's the worst case scenario you can say... :) I think it is anti-proportional to the TB-size (seems logical to me) - when compression is better, the extracted part is longer... But I don't know - Bob, Eugene ?! > Should I also assume that this 40M is not taken out of the memory allocated > for the hash, and is instead dynamically allocated? correct, it is dynamically allocated. Greets, Thomas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.