Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 18:59:57 01/04/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 04, 2002 at 21:43:50, Jorge Pichard wrote: >Kramnik have two options: to play like Kramnik or to play like "Mr. Anti Fritz." >The former runs the risk of playing to the strengths of the machines, the latter >that the human ends up as disoriented as the machine. Humans, too, play weaker >in unfamiliar situations and though they may find their way around better, >machines can compensate for that with brute force. We all know that Fritz is at >a disadvantage, since Kramnik is studying Fritz games very carefully. However, >humans can't change their style drastically like computers. On top of that, all >his games are accessible to the Chessbase team, Kramnik is NOT in the dark like >Kasparov was about Deep Blue. > >Jorge. it doesn't matter what kramnik does, he will win. his normal style can be described as 'anti computer' already. 1.nf3 then passively mess around. only with black he has a small problem. in fact all his openings suck compared to other world top players. But he is 4000 rated in strategy + technique. So just get a position on the board and he'll win from anything.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.