Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 07:16:22 01/05/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 05, 2002 at 10:01:24, Dieter Buerssner wrote: >I think, Yace is not so good at mates, where the position already looks won, >because it limits its extension here (or better, doesn't do most extensions at >all). Also, I think it is not important for practical playing strength, because >with a score of +9.x chess programs will usually win (studies might be an >exception). > >Another example, where no large advantage can be found at shallow depth: > >[D] 6r1/2rp1kpp/2qQp3/p3Pp1P/1pP2P2/1P2KP2/P5R1/6R1 w - - Nice position! (and hard too) P: 0 D: 1410293149 N: 3526580 S: 3526579 Mem: 94.17M Iters: 174159 MaxDepth: 35 Time : 12.330000 This position is WON. PV: g2g7 g8g7 g1g7 f7g7 d6e7 g7g8 e7e8 g8g7 h5h6 g7h6 e8f8 h6h5 f8f7 h5h4 f7h7 h4g3 h7g6 g3h2 e3f2 h2h1 g6g2 12.3 seconds -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.