Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 14:46:32 01/05/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 05, 2002 at 13:56:14, Uri Blass wrote:
>On January 05, 2002 at 12:21:00, ERIQ wrote:
>
>>On January 05, 2002 at 10:46:52, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>
>>>On January 05, 2002 at 10:39:23, ERIQ wrote:
>>>
>>>>On January 05, 2002 at 10:28:34, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On January 05, 2002 at 10:23:33, ERIQ wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>I would think that the palm guys would like it to run faster in light of pocket
>>>>>>pc runing at 200+. I also would like a tougher opponent.
>>>>>
>>>>>Probably 50 rating points more than with a handspring 33 MHz overclocked to 48
>>>>>or 54 MHz. With an overclocked Handspring there are not too many masters that
>>>>>can beat the little beast.
>>>>>
>>>>>Jorge
>>>
>>>>I have already overclocked to the max and am now beating the beast in my
>>>>training games (1hrs per side), but I think it would be very different if it
>>>>were at 100mhz. Also a much bigger book would also be nice :)
>>>>
>>>> Sign,
>>>> Eriq (est.2100 elo)
>>>
>>>
>>>Yes I totally agree that Chess Tiger 14.7 needs a bigger book, Eriq can you post
>>>the games.
>>>
>>>Jorge
>>At the moment I'm at the library but yes I can. I have recorded about 14
>>training games, after losing that first 10 game match w/ ct I have found a
>>weakness but most of which have to do w/ ability to seach deeper.I think the
>>opening is good but not deep enough in some lines.
>>
>>I can tell you now that I win about 75% of my games though I must admit that I
>>forced CT to play some different lines than the one's in it's book in alot of my
>>games. Now most of the time the opening didn't have much to do w/ result. I have
>>no doubt if I played it another fair 10 game match using default book I would
>>win.
>>
>>Average ply depth for my palm is 6-7 in middle game this is not enough for some
>>tactics but if it could get 8-10 it would see everything and I would not win.
>>that is why I asked about 100mhz palm. I hope author of tiger reads this as this
>>is the only weakness I could exploit !!
>
>I believe that it can be also done by better software.
>You search less nodes than tiger for the palm and if you could see the tactics
>then I am sure that tiger can also see it with better extension and pruning
>rules.
>
>Uri
Feel free to write an algorithm that does that, Uri. ;)
Better extensions and pruning rules? Sure, it sounds so simple! :)
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.