Author: leonid
Date: 06:38:33 01/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 07, 2002 at 05:15:38, Dann Corbit wrote: >On January 07, 2002 at 05:05:31, Jouni Uski wrote: > >>On January 07, 2002 at 04:59:54, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>On January 07, 2002 at 04:47:50, Will Bundy wrote: >>>>Hi >>>> >>>> In this position Fritz7a announces mate in 8 in 1 sec!!! I expected chessmaster >>>>to find it in the same amount of time, didn't happen. >>>> >>>> >>>> 2R2R2/5p2/p3p2p/4P1pk/7N/P5PP/5P1K/1q6 w - g6 id Fritz 7 - ; bm g3g4; >>> >>>I don't think you can reasonably draw any sensible conclusions from a single >>>position. Try it on a couple hundred. If it's faster with a large set of >>>positions, then your conclusion is likely to follow. If not, then not. >> >>Yes it's very difficult to say anything sure! I have tactical test set with 200 >>positions and still I cannot say sure, which program is the best in solving: >>Fritz, Tiger or Goliath. And "toy" programs like Chessmaster I haven't even >>tested. > >The output of Chest319 for this problem: > >[D]2R2R2/5p2/p3p2p/4P1pk/7N/P5PP/5P1K/1q6 w - g6 acn 18544563; acs 116; bm Rxf7 >g4+; ce 32752; dm 8; pv g4+ Kxh4 Rh8 Qg6 Rcg8 Qh5 Rh7 f5 exf6ep e5 Rgh8 e4 Rxh6 >e3 Rxh5#; One second for this position is for sure nice time. Mine (LLchess mate solver) was not able find mate by its selective. By brute force it find mate in 8 moves in 3 min and 22 sec. Celeron 600Mhz. No hash. Leonid.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.