Author: Rafael Andrist
Date: 10:20:20 01/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 07, 2002 at 10:03:41, David Rasmussen wrote: >In SEE, the king should of course be the last to capture, as no piece can >capture the king. But the king should also have some large value to indicate a >winning capture for the opposing side. In a position such as this: > >[D]2rqkb1r/p1pnpppp/3p3n/3B4/2BPP3/1QP5/PP3PPP/RN2K1NR w KQk - 0 1 I would stop the capture sequence before involving the king in this case. If you only have a king to (re-)capture and there are still other pieces "pointing" to the to-square, stop the capture sequence. regards Rafael B. Andrist
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.