Author: David Rasmussen
Date: 10:31:47 01/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 07, 2002 at 13:20:20, Rafael Andrist wrote: >On January 07, 2002 at 10:03:41, David Rasmussen wrote: > >>In SEE, the king should of course be the last to capture, as no piece can >>capture the king. But the king should also have some large value to indicate a >>winning capture for the opposing side. In a position such as this: >> >>[D]2rqkb1r/p1pnpppp/3p3n/3B4/2BPP3/1QP5/PP3PPP/RN2K1NR w KQk - 0 1 > >I would stop the capture sequence before involving the king in this case. If you >only have a king to (re-)capture and there are still other pieces "pointing" to >the to-square, stop the capture sequence. > >regards >Rafael B. Andrist Yeah, that's what I have suggested too, after writing my first post. /David
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.