Author: James T. Walker
Date: 10:40:45 01/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 07, 2002 at 10:22:46, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On January 07, 2002 at 10:02:37, James T. Walker wrote: > >>It's more or less accepted that a doubling of speed gives only about 50-70 elo >>points increase. Therefore your chart makes not sense. If we use a compromise >>of say 60 elo increase the 2000Mhz machine would score approximately 58.5%. >>Also there is no reason for this percentage to vary with time controls using the >>same engine. >>Jim > > >Actually there is a _big_ reason why the data came out as it did. Look at >anybody's results where they used the _same_ program, but played one copy at >depth=N and another at depth N-1. At shallow depths, N wipes N-1 out. As the >depth goes deeper, N does't do nearly as well. IE 4ply to 3ply, for the >_same_ program, is a 33% deeper search for 4 ply. For 10 ply vs 11 ply, >the difference is 10% deeper... Hello Bob, What is the point of your post? I don't see what it has to do with the thread. Can you explain further? I like learning about stuff like this but you have confused me. Jim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.