Author: David Hanley
Date: 10:58:35 01/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 07, 2002 at 12:06:01, David Rasmussen wrote: >On January 07, 2002 at 10:20:03, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >> >>Make it something impossibly large. Then make sure that the king is the _last_ >>piece used to make a capture. All works fine that way... > >I know thats what you do :) > >But won't that just make the capture sequences that ends with a king capture, >look very good? This may be a silly question, but aren't sequences that end with a king capture very very good anyhow? This can happen with regular exchange sequences too; a side can decide to not keep the exhange sequence going, stand pat, and have the advantage--right? I'm not sure that kings are special here. dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.