Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 11:17:13 01/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 07, 2002 at 13:58:35, David Hanley wrote: >On January 07, 2002 at 12:06:01, David Rasmussen wrote: > >>On January 07, 2002 at 10:20:03, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>> >>>Make it something impossibly large. Then make sure that the king is the _last_ >>>piece used to make a capture. All works fine that way... >> >>I know thats what you do :) >> >>But won't that just make the capture sequences that ends with a king capture, >>look very good? > >This may be a silly question, but aren't sequences that end with a king capture >very very good anyhow? > They are ok if they end with KxSomething. But not if they end with SomethingxKing which would be illegal and means that the previous capture by the king was actually illegal. Doing it as I do takes care of this case perfectly.. >This can happen with regular exchange sequences too; a side can decide to not >keep the exhange sequence going, stand pat, and have the advantage--right? I'm >not sure that kings are special here. > >dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.