Author: Uri Blass
Date: 13:56:46 01/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 07, 2002 at 14:53:25, Bas Hamstra wrote: >On January 07, 2002 at 13:44:43, Joshua Lee wrote: > >>you are Ill informed . As much as i think the SSDF is Inaccurate in it's >>ratings it does a few things that are consistent: >>1 Shows which programs are stronger than others and on what hardware >> >>This is the only point i need to make to totally bust your argument because >>if you look at the estimated ammounts they give for each of their hardware >>increases or if you take the averages from one set of hardware to another you >>should see clearly that in reality there is a definite increase in most newer >>versions. I don't know how the program authors do it but they do..... >>look at Junior 6 and 7 on a K6-2 450. > >I dont see your point. I am not saying that programs don't improve. But I do say >that Junior 7 does not stand a chance against Junior 6 on 2x slower hardware. >Can you find 1 program where a newer version beats an older on 2x slower >hardware? > >Bas. Yes Fritz7 on old hardware beats Fritz3 on fast hardware if the hardware adavantage is 2:1 I am not sure about Fritz7b and Fritz6 but it may be interesting to test. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.