Author: Rajen Gupta
Date: 15:26:23 01/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 07, 2002 at 15:18:52, Dan Andersson wrote: >Sorry to disagree. But when reading the benchmarks closely. It is apparent that >the new P4 and the XP 2000+ are roughly equivalent in overall performance. And >that is a pretty good indicator that the chesswise comparison is still pretty >favourable to the Athlon. You must remember that Crafty ran almost 50% faster on >the top of the line Athlon before this new iteration of the P4. That won't go >away by a 10% hike in processor speed, and maybe 8% due to a larger cache. But >the speed ramp of the P4 family might do it. > >MvH Dan Andersson. i hope you are right as i too am an amd fan. i was merely correlating my observations from what p4 and amd owners on this web site had posted in terms of fritz and tiger marks and compared the hardware reviews and found that these office productivity correlated best with chess performance. i noted that the old willamette 2.0 showed rough equivalence with an amd 1.33. we'll only know for sure after the actual benchmarks are up rajen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.