Author: Torstein Hall
Date: 15:50:51 01/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 07, 2002 at 12:53:17, Rajen Gupta wrote: >see the follwing web site > >http://www.anandtech.com/cpu/showdoc.html?i=1574&p=6 > >i think these bench marks are roughly equivalent to chess performance of the >various processors. ( the old p4 willamette at 2.0 ghz is roughly equaivalent to >an athlon 1.33 both in terms of chess performance as well as in these office >productivity benchmarks) of note is the score of the new "Northwood 2.2 ghz. in >these bench marks seems to be running ahead of the amd 2000.perhpas may also >reflect the chess performance as well. > >also while intel has included several performance enhancing features-higher >cache, higher bus speeds(in the next few months) and smaller die size. amd has >none of these planned (except for the smaller die size) > >i'm afraid that amd may lose all the goodwill they have earned so far unless >they get their act together real soon > >any actual chess benchmarks will be appreciated > >rajen I do not think AMD has anything to be ashamed of! You will probably see them moving to 0.13 production this half year, and getting more speed and better production yield. And next we see the Hammer comming out. How it will stack up against the P4 at say 4Ghz is something only the fututre can tell. Anyway, I think its far to early to count out AMD. Torstein
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.