Author: Rajen Gupta
Date: 15:13:01 01/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 07, 2002 at 18:50:51, Torstein Hall wrote: >On January 07, 2002 at 12:53:17, Rajen Gupta wrote: > >>see the follwing web site >> >>http://www.anandtech.com/cpu/showdoc.html?i=1574&p=6 >> >>i think these bench marks are roughly equivalent to chess performance of the >>various processors. ( the old p4 willamette at 2.0 ghz is roughly equaivalent to >>an athlon 1.33 both in terms of chess performance as well as in these office >>productivity benchmarks) of note is the score of the new "Northwood 2.2 ghz. in >>these bench marks seems to be running ahead of the amd 2000.perhpas may also >>reflect the chess performance as well. >> >>also while intel has included several performance enhancing features-higher >>cache, higher bus speeds(in the next few months) and smaller die size. amd has >>none of these planned (except for the smaller die size) >> >>i'm afraid that amd may lose all the goodwill they have earned so far unless >>they get their act together real soon >> >>any actual chess benchmarks will be appreciated >> >>rajen > >I do not think AMD has anything to be ashamed of! You will probably see them >moving to 0.13 production this half year, and getting more speed and better >production yield. And next we see the Hammer comming out. How it will stack up >against the P4 at say 4Ghz is something only the fututre can tell. >Anyway, I think its far to early to count out AMD. > >Torstein lets hope that happens before its too late. amd should have at least doubled the level 2 cache. that alone would have given at least a 1, maybe 2 speed increase in performance as it has done for intel. rajen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.