Author: Bas Hamstra
Date: 15:47:35 01/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 07, 2002 at 16:56:46, Uri Blass wrote: >On January 07, 2002 at 14:53:25, Bas Hamstra wrote: > >>On January 07, 2002 at 13:44:43, Joshua Lee wrote: >> >>>you are Ill informed . As much as i think the SSDF is Inaccurate in it's >>>ratings it does a few things that are consistent: >>>1 Shows which programs are stronger than others and on what hardware >>> >>>This is the only point i need to make to totally bust your argument because >>>if you look at the estimated ammounts they give for each of their hardware >>>increases or if you take the averages from one set of hardware to another you >>>should see clearly that in reality there is a definite increase in most newer >>>versions. I don't know how the program authors do it but they do..... >>>look at Junior 6 and 7 on a K6-2 450. >> >>I dont see your point. I am not saying that programs don't improve. But I do say >>that Junior 7 does not stand a chance against Junior 6 on 2x slower hardware. >>Can you find 1 program where a newer version beats an older on 2x slower >>hardware? >> >>Bas. > >Yes > >Fritz7 on old hardware beats Fritz3 on fast hardware >if the hardware adavantage is 2:1 > >I am not sure about Fritz7b and Fritz6 but >it may be interesting to test. > >Uri How do you know? Data! Numbers, tables. Photo's :-) Are you willing to take a bet? I say Fritz3 is going to win. Bas.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.