Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Hypothetical situation

Author: Russell Reagan

Date: 19:04:45 01/08/02

Go up one level in this thread


On January 07, 2002 at 18:54:12, David Dory wrote:

>On January 07, 2002 at 17:03:03, Pierre Bourget wrote:
>
>>Imagine that a player with a good rating enter a tournament and in fact the
>>moves he makes came from a relatively unknow program running on very fast
>>hardware, the moves being relayed to him in a way that nobody can suspect
>>anything.The player to behave in a very normal way at the board ,not doing the
>>stupid mistake like announcing mate in 10 for example ,normally doing long
>>thinking for a difficult move ,etc. Imagine that he makes a normal progession
>>from tournaments to tournaments losing a game here and there voluntarily .Do you
>>think that it will be possible to detect that he is a cheater just looking at
>>the games ? Do you think that we can win many tournaments ? Do you think that
>>his opponents will begin to suspect something ? Do you think that this kind of
>>trickery could last a long time ? And finally perhaps this situation really
>>exist and nobody knows , is it possible ?
>
>This scenario has been tried in Las Vegas Casino's with various card games,
>especially blackjack.
>
>Yes, he got away with it for a while. Yes, he was caught. (He was using
>specialty glasses that had tiny indicator lights embedded into the frames so
>only someone wearing the glasses would see the lights indicating how he should
>bet.
>
>The problem is, life is unexpected and experience builds up cumulative. If the
>new GM never has a good insight into a chess question off the cuff, and his
>winning games always mimic how a chess program would respond. (And even though
>he throws a few games and a few moves he still must be winning most of his games
>by using the computer's winning moves).


Here's an interesting twist: what if the cheating player was deaf and unable to
hear or speak? How would this affect his lack of chess insight?


>Short version - doomed to failure. Had it been perfected 30 years ago and used,
>the novelty might have let it run for a long time. But not today.
>
>Dave



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.