Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 13:22:10 01/09/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 09, 2002 at 14:47:32, David Rasmussen wrote: >On January 09, 2002 at 12:46:39, Bo Persson wrote: > >> >>Another idea is to *not* go into quiescence search when a promotion is imminent, >>but instead extend the search another ply. >> >> > > >Sure. I do the pawn push extension too. But you can still have some long capture >sequences in q-search, where some of the captures are also promotions. That is >what I am talking about. Hmm, I always did capturing promotions. My data is for non-capturing promotions. They cause a significant difference in material evaluation, so it's probably worthwhile to include them in qsearch too. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.