Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 14:18:24 01/09/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 09, 2002 at 17:12:23, Bas Hamstra wrote: >On January 09, 2002 at 15:17:36, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On January 09, 2002 at 12:58:18, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: >> >>>On January 09, 2002 at 12:45:27, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>On January 09, 2002 at 10:15:53, David Rasmussen wrote: >>>> >>>>>Some time ago we talked about the recapture extension. Bob's experiments with >>>>>Crafty seemed to show that recapture extension was a bad idea at least for his >>>>>program. >>>>> >>>>>How many people have the recapture extension because they positively believe >>>>>that it is better for their program, and how many has removed it from their >>>>>program because the positively believe that it is bad for their program? >>>>> >>>>>I am sure a lot of people have it or don't have it, but for no specific reason, >>>>>that is, they have not tested the effect of this extension thoroughly. >>>>> >>>>>/David >>>> >>>> >>>>Note that I still use it. It definitely slows things down at times, but >>>>allowing my opponent to burn two plies "at will" by making a capture that I >>>>have to reply to seems dangerous to ignore... >>> >>>So, you prefer following your intuition, though it is not in complete accordance >>>with the statistics of the experiment which you have done once (IIRC) ? >>> >>>Uli >> >> >>yep... >> >>:) > >Same goes for me. I don't know what the outcome of this experiment was, but for >me leaving it in seems to "break even". It solves a few tactics extra and misses >a few others. I have always had doubts if it really effectively reduces horizon >effects in games. > >Bas. In that case i assume you threw it out, in order to get another ply more?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.