Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: the empire strikes back

Author: Ricardo Gibert

Date: 23:59:03 01/09/02

Go up one level in this thread

On January 07, 2002 at 16:00:58, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:

>On January 07, 2002 at 12:53:17, Rajen Gupta wrote:
>
>>i'm afraid that amd may lose all the goodwill they have earned so far unless
>>they get their act together real soon
>
>Funny, I've been (and still am) thinking the same of Intel
>for quite a while.
>
>The P4 is garbage from a technical point of view, and
>their current Itaniums seem to be too, based on the benchmarks
>we have seen so far. Their only hope is to keep pushing up
>the clockspeed as high as they can, but the design has limits
>*somewhere*, as the original P3 at 1.13Ghz showed (totall recall
>due to instabily).

http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/3/23593.html

FYI

>
>When are they going to come with a _new_ CPU with a design
>that is _better_ than that of the Pentium Pro?
>
>--
>GCP

• Re: the empire strikes back Roy Eassa 09:36:23 01/11/02
  • Re: the empire strikes back leonid 19:03:32 01/12/02
• Re: the empire strikes back Gian-Carlo Pascutto 00:07:44 01/10/02
  • Re: the empire strikes back Ricardo Gibert 02:37:00 01/10/02
    • Re: the empire strikes back Gian-Carlo Pascutto 02:45:23 01/10/02
      • Re: the empire strikes back Ricardo Gibert 03:05:42 01/10/02
        • Re: the empire strikes back Gian-Carlo Pascutto 03:09:04 01/10/02
          • Re: the empire strikes back Ricardo Gibert 03:28:29 01/10/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.