Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 00:07:44 01/10/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 10, 2002 at 02:59:03, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >On January 07, 2002 at 16:00:58, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>On January 07, 2002 at 12:53:17, Rajen Gupta wrote: >> >>>i'm afraid that amd may lose all the goodwill they have earned so far unless >>>they get their act together real soon >> >>Funny, I've been (and still am) thinking the same of Intel >>for quite a while. >> >>The P4 is garbage from a technical point of view, and >>their current Itaniums seem to be too, based on the benchmarks >>we have seen so far. Their only hope is to keep pushing up >>the clockspeed as high as they can, but the design has limits >>*somewhere*, as the original P3 at 1.13Ghz showed (totall recall >>due to instabily). > >http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/3/23593.html Please read what I wrote. I said the _original_ P3. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.