Author: Ricardo Gibert
Date: 02:37:00 01/10/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 10, 2002 at 03:07:44, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On January 10, 2002 at 02:59:03, Ricardo Gibert wrote: > >>On January 07, 2002 at 16:00:58, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >> >>>On January 07, 2002 at 12:53:17, Rajen Gupta wrote: >>> >>>>i'm afraid that amd may lose all the goodwill they have earned so far unless >>>>they get their act together real soon >>> >>>Funny, I've been (and still am) thinking the same of Intel >>>for quite a while. >>> >>>The P4 is garbage from a technical point of view, and >>>their current Itaniums seem to be too, based on the benchmarks >>>we have seen so far. Their only hope is to keep pushing up >>>the clockspeed as high as they can, but the design has limits >>>*somewhere*, as the original P3 at 1.13Ghz showed (totall recall >>>due to instabily). >> >>http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/3/23593.html > >Please read what I wrote. I said the _original_ P3. Please read what you wrote. You said, "..., but the design has limits *somewhere*, as the original P3 at 1.13Ghz showed..." > >-- >GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.