Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 02:45:23 01/10/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 10, 2002 at 05:37:00, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >On January 10, 2002 at 03:07:44, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>On January 10, 2002 at 02:59:03, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >> >>>On January 07, 2002 at 16:00:58, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >>> >>>>On January 07, 2002 at 12:53:17, Rajen Gupta wrote: >>>> >>>>>i'm afraid that amd may lose all the goodwill they have earned so far unless >>>>>they get their act together real soon >>>> >>>>Funny, I've been (and still am) thinking the same of Intel >>>>for quite a while. >>>> >>>>The P4 is garbage from a technical point of view, and >>>>their current Itaniums seem to be too, based on the benchmarks >>>>we have seen so far. Their only hope is to keep pushing up >>>>the clockspeed as high as they can, but the design has limits >>>>*somewhere*, as the original P3 at 1.13Ghz showed (totall recall >>>>due to instabily). >>> >>>http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/3/23593.html >> >>Please read what I wrote. I said the _original_ P3. > >Please read what you wrote. You said, "..., but the design has limits >*somewhere*, as the original P3 at 1.13Ghz showed..." Right. So with smaller process technology, it can go a bit higher, but it's still limited. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.