Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Good, Bad and Active Bishop

Author: Dan Andersson

Date: 10:16:37 01/11/02

Go up one level in this thread


Some hefty ply depths you are mentioning. I happen to agree in principle with
them. But do you really think a program would survive if it searched eight ply
less? Just joking:) The problem is that even the best evaluation available today
is 'always' wrong, it will asses the static features but will have no clue of
the future of the position. Thus missing the mark more often than not. The real
mystery here is that current chess programs manage so well in the first place.
Well, it's really no mystery but surprising none the less.

MvH Dan Andersson



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.