Author: Kim Hvarre
Date: 19:12:33 06/15/98
Go up one level in this thread
On June 15, 1998 at 12:33:06, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On June 15, 1998 at 08:18:06, Kim Hvarre wrote: >>In the future - I think - SSDF will have do buy e.g. Rebel, if they >>wants to incklude it on the list, but let's see! (I hope they settle >>with that solution, then nobody can "withdraw" from the list! >> >>kim > >The discussion was held in paderborn. >Is rebel ED's or are the ssdf-allowed to publish results about ed's baby if he >does not want. >It could e.g. be that ed can stop publishing the list in magazines IF his rebel >is still in the list although he forbid it. Thats the question. >Lawyers will find out. I guess the customer can do what he wants, as long as he >is not doing it in public. >In the moment it comes into the public, the rights come back to ed. >I would not be allowed to participate a chess-championship with using rebel ? >Only ed should be allowed to do so. I am only licensed to USE it for my own, not >for competitions in public. SSDF is a "closed", i.e. memberbased club. They can test what ever they want to. And "publish" the list among themselves - whatever lacking to other places isn't SSDF' problem and not legal related. The draw back is the fact, that the members in the future will tend to test only the programs, the members themselves are interessted in, i.e. want to buy! Perhaps this is a solution anyway. SSDF (again) being 100% independent of relations to the programmers? kim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.