Author: Torstein Hall
Date: 01:41:40 01/12/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 11, 2002 at 19:18:33, James Doby wrote: >On January 11, 2002 at 18:14:41, Brian Katz wrote: > >>- >> I have had some concerns about the playing strength of the new Fritz 7 engine >>in comparison to Fritz 6e or Deep Fritz. BUT....................... >> Here is a sample Fritz 7 win against Grandmaster Mark Hebden (FIDE 2558)played >>on ICC on 1/10/02 at a 5/12 time control. >> >> In my opinion, this game was quite impressive. >> >> I used Fritz 7 under the computer sign on Deep-Katzparov. >> >> I was only using a Hewlett Packard 8370 Pavilion, 350 MHz Pentium II, 384 >>SDRAM (upgraded from 64 SDRAM) on the Windows 98 operating system. >> I had Fritz 7 set at the time control of 5/10, with the hash tables set at >>32MB (which may be too high for the time control). I had to manually transfer >>all moves. >> Perhaps some of you out there will appreciate the strength of these programs. >>When these programs lose a given game to some other program, we tend to forget >>just how strong they really are. This game was only played using a 350 MHz!! >> >>Hope you enjoy it. >> >> >>Deep-Katzparov (2894) - mhebden (2829) [E62] >>ICC 5 12 Internet Chess Club, 10.01.2002 >> >>1.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 g6 3.g3 Bg7 4.Bg2 0-0 5.0-0 d6 6.c4 Nc6 7.Nc3 Rb8 8.h3 a6 9.e4 b5 >>10.e5 Nd7 11.e6 fxe6 12.d5 exd5 13.cxd5 Na7 14.Nd4 Ne5 15.Nce2 Qe8 16.Nf4 Rf6 >>17.Re1 Bd7 18.Nde6 c5 19.Nxc5 dxc5 20.Rxe5 Nc8 21.Ne6 Bxe6 22.dxe6 Nd6 23.Rxc5 >>Kh8 24.Bd5 Qf8 25.Qe2 Bh6 26.f4 Rd8 27.Be3 Nf5 28.Bf2 g5 29.g4 Nd6 30.fxg5 Bxg5 >>31.Bd4 Kg8 32.Rc6 Qh6 33.Bxf6 Bxf6 34.Rf1 Nc4 35.Bxc4 bxc4 36.Rxc4 Qxh3 37.Rf3 >>Qh4 38.Kg2 Qg5 39.Rf5 Qg6 40.b4 Kg7 41.a3 Rd6 42.Rcc5 h6 43.Kh3 Qe8 44.g5 hxg5 >>45.Rxg5+ Bxg5 46.Rxg5+ Kh6 47.Qe5 Rd3+ 48.Kg4 Black resigns 1-0 >> >>I would love to hear comments on the game or the use of only a 350 MHz >>processor. > > > > What do you mean "only a 350 MHz"? Are you forgetting that just two short >years ago, Hiarcs6 Defeated a Strong International Master at 40/2, running on a >Pent MMX 200! That match was 40/2 and we all know computers are even stronger at >shorter time controls such as the one you used above. I think Dean Hergot was a strong IM when he played Hiarcs. I think he was pretty rusty at the time......and the game was played in some kind of noisy shoppinp mall. But I may remember wrong about both Hergot and the match! Torstein
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.