Author: Sune Larsson
Date: 16:36:49 01/12/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 12, 2002 at 19:06:32, pavel wrote: >On January 12, 2002 at 18:47:03, Roy Eassa wrote: > >>On January 12, 2002 at 17:53:23, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote: >> >>>On January 12, 2002 at 12:19:25, Roy Eassa wrote: >>> >>>>There are many very talented programmers here and many who understand the >>>>technical details well (these are NOT mutually exclusive groups!). Is this >>>>technically feasible or simply impossible or too difficult to consider? >>> >>>I deduce from you message that there are not many talented programmers in >>>the Chessbase staff to do it. Otherwise... should not that be their job? >>> >>>Miguel >> >> >>I don't think it's a matter of talent. I think it's a matter of politics, >>marketing, management, and customer service. > > >Its a matter of taking the time to do it. > >chessmaster, rebeltiger, chessAssistant, shredder, and probably others support >very good and nearly perfect winboard protocol or adapter. > >they are also top chess software company. If you are good enough, what is there >to be afraid off? I thing chessbase knows it very well that none of the free >winboard engine are yet comparable to their top programs. > >I guess they are just too bored. I guess they think it's too little profit to be made from the WinBoard stuff. I simply isn't interesting from their point of view, IMHO. Sune > >;) >pavs
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.