Author: Tina Long
Date: 04:05:16 01/13/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 13, 2002 at 06:28:19, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On FICS, series of 24 5min+5sec games: > >Gambit Tiger 2: > >AMD Athlon ThunderBird (overclocked to 1.533Ghz) >512M Ram >3-4-5-6 man tablebases > >Gandalf 5: > >AMD Athlon XP 1800 (1.533Ghz) >768M Ram (200M hashtables, which is the maximum) >3-4-5 man tablebases > >Result for Gandalf: > >2 wins, 6 draws, 16 losses > >-- >GCP Hi Gian-Carlo, Wow, Gandalf got flogged! I wonder why: Gigantic hash tables for very quick time limit didn't suit Gandalf? Gandalf is more knowledge based so GambitTigger looked a lot deeper because of the quick time limit? The extra Tablebases helped GT? Sample size too small? Did you notice any explaining factors or do you think this is a fair comparison of strength? Apriori I would have expected about 8-6-10 or thereabouts. Regards Tina
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.