Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 10:44:32 01/13/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 13, 2002 at 01:30:09, pavel wrote: >On January 13, 2002 at 01:17:59, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On January 12, 2002 at 20:53:19, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On January 11, 2002 at 20:34:52, Dann Corbit wrote: >>> >>>>On January 11, 2002 at 19:27:31, James Doby wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Knowing Vincent I have little Doubt he would say not Only yes, but he would >>>>>claim to beat it everytime without a Loss!!! >>>> >>>>You claim to know Vincent. I rather doubt it. >>> >>>let's look to deep blue, how many bad moves a game it makes. >>>then look howmany bad moves a game i would make when playing >>>a computer (i of course do not go for open positions) >>> >>>then you will conclude i make less bad moves a game than >>>deep blue made on average against kasparov. So i win from it. >>> >>>Easy proof. >> >>No proof >> >>There is no law that the side who does less bad moves win in chess. >> >>You can do 20 bad moves in a game when your opponent is going to do only one >>tactical mistake and you are going to win. >> >>Uri > >When someone who is, as good player and a programmer like him says, something as >obviously stupid like that, there is nothing more to say. > > >Don't take this guy seriously Uri, >Its just a waste of time. Pavel Mahamood says your profile. I can't even find you at the USCF rating list, so you would be commenting upon the chance that a certain deepsea operation can take place with as much expertise i guess. Not to mention that you never analyzed the games from Deep Blue, or know something about what kind of things can lose for you a game or win a game. > >;)pavs
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.