Author: Peter Berger
Date: 11:22:18 01/13/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 13, 2002 at 14:02:02, Rex wrote: >> >>The only additional parameter that has been discussed here as far as I remember >>is the Selsafety one. There was an Italian guy ( Fabio X?) who did very >>scientific tests but I think his final results weren't conclusive after all. The >>last post I remember annouced a long additional test but it doesn't seem to be >>finished yet. >> >>Have you come to any conclusions in your tests? > >Anything I say someone will say "thats not enough to determine..ect..ect.." Its >the same old stuff around in around on CCC. So I wont say execpt only one fact >does show win after win.. Ok a guess someone can still say "thats not enough >games!!" sorry I cant be of much help. You shouldn't care about these fast answers - if you post an opinion you'll always get a few : not enough games , no statistical significance etc. And someone will probably test it with many games - some ideas survive, some don't. But I am interested in your ideas . You said that you found a "unique playing style" for Chess Tiger that strengthens it very much - that's interesting news. Well, or it could be - if you explain which settings you are talking about. If you don't want to talk about it ( which is your business), then I wonder why you mentioned it here in the first place. Regards, pete
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.