Author: Harald Faber
Date: 22:09:47 01/13/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 11, 2002 at 06:38:46, Uri Blass wrote: >On January 11, 2002 at 01:12:56, Harald Faber wrote: > >>On January 10, 2002 at 17:13:05, robert flesher wrote: >> >>>I have played now 100+ game against Tiger and Gambit tiger! The over all score >>>favour's Gandalf Slightly. So i believe that it will make top 3 with easy. >>>People draw conclusion after 10 games. >> >>I draw conclusions after 50-100 games. It is enough if you take a look at the >>games. At the moment (no conclusion) it does not look very good for Gadnalf in >>my test, 2.5-7.5 vs. Shredder 6 and 2.5-7.5 vs. Fritz 7a. > >It is possible that one of the reasons is that gandalf suffers from your >hardware. >I know that gandalf is one of the programs that earn more speed from faster CPU. > This is nonsense and only to explain the bad results. This "Program A needs fast hardware" is rubbish since years and never has been true. >I remember that at least Gandalf4.32h is one of the programs that earns more >from faster hardware. Who proved that, how/based on what? I have never seen that. >That Gandalf may be about 5 times slower than Junior in nodes per second when >you use slow hardware >and only 2-3 times slower than Junior in nodes per seconds when you use fast >hardware. This is against every logic. Could you explain that to me? >I am not sure about the exact number and it is only the idea. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.