Author: Severi Salminen
Date: 10:25:32 01/14/02
Go up one level in this thread
>>I'm doing allmost the same, but is it _certain_ that the 2nd bsf _never_ alters >>eax if nothing is found? Why don't they write "unaffected" but "undefined"???Can >>someone confirm this? >> >>Severi > >This is like over-clocking the specification. It *seems* to work, even though >Intel says it should not. > >As usual this probably means that it works fine, except during any WCCC event. It would be interesting to see in what cases eax _will_ be altered. Has anyone asked Intel?? Maybe I could. Severi
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.