Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 13:57:19 06/16/98
Go up one level in this thread
On June 15, 1998 at 17:34:31, Mark Young wrote: >On June 15, 1998 at 16:20:32, Moritz Berger wrote: > >>On June 15, 1998 at 15:49:04, Thorsten Czub wrote: >> >>>What is Vincents sin ? >>>Why moderation ? >>>he has an opinion and he tells us his opinion. >>> >>>All I see moritz is that you call him a liar by saying he lies ! >>>THIS is a case for moderation. But not Vincent telling us his opinion about >>>opening books. >>> >>>Isn't this not allowed because it is AGAINST fritz ? >>>But it would be allowed if it is against rebel ? >> >>I protested against both his attacks on Rebel and Fritz. >>Facts are facts are facts. >> > >I don’t think attacks on a program should carry the same weight as attacks on a >person. Even if the attacks seem to come out of left field. This is a computer >chess group and if someone has something to say about a program good or bad, >they should be able to say it. As long as it does not get out of hand. > >>>I have bought fritz5. Am I allowed to comment on fritz5. Or is only somebody >>>allowed to say something who has the magic-autoplayer from ChessBase ? >>>I see no case of moderation here. But - we see again how different >>>people evaluate this. >>>Good that I don't have to decide. You don't see it right? I'm not attacking Rebel for making the killerbook, i'm not even attacking rebel. It's clear that it won from Diep this match. I just want YOU the audience to know that book cooking is happening, and that the rebel book was again a reaction on the killing cg5 book (cg5 book kills especially rebel8 book). Vincent.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.