Author: Miguel A. Ballicora
Date: 09:02:38 01/15/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 15, 2002 at 08:35:00, jefkaan wrote: >On January 15, 2002 at 00:24:06, pavel wrote: >>Yup, it's better to deal with it than talk about it, and coz misunderstandings. >>If it's not a clone than the author shouldn't have a problem to cooperate. > >ok, i've sent a copy of the recent sourcefile (only one file..) >to the tournament organizer (Volker); nullmove recently added You should not have sent anything at all, unless everyone of the participants send a copy too. What is this? a selective witch hunt against newcomers? This is ridiculous and you should not have fallen for this. Is Vincent going to send a copy too? There was a similar problem last time against a program that did too well. An amateur program and was accused of many things making the programmer very uncomfortable, putting him in a position to prove his innocence. Why? even pretigious people here get paranoid. My quesion is: Is everybody now going to send a copy of the version used in this tournament or you were finger pointed by a spurious accusation? Miguel >(thx Bas, for the pseudocode) but now it runs wild sometimes >tactically, although i included checking if side to move is in >check, and playing nullmove only every odd or even ply.. >To avoid further confusion i consider to open a temporarily >account (one month) on Icc with handle 'djenghis', >best regards >Jan >PS yet still i wonder Vincent's agressive behaviour to apparent >newcomers in the field of computer chess (smelling competition ?); >the intention of Djenghis, made just for fun, is to play gambits >on Fics (see handle 'djenghis' there..), its not intended >to compete with excellent engines like Yace and soforth..
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.