Author: Peter Berger
Date: 13:28:01 01/15/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 15, 2002 at 15:19:38, Bruce Moreland wrote: >On January 15, 2002 at 15:11:26, Volker Richey wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>Michael Borgstaedt told me: >> >>Goliath Light 1.5 was based on a 3rd generation engine. >>(engine v3.x, you will find it in Little Goliath 2000 v3.0 and 3.5 >>also in the ChessBase-Natives Goliath Light 1.0 und 1.5). >> >>The next generation was the engine v4.0. The commercial engine >>was included in the software "Goliath Blitz". >> >>Goliath Blitz is stronger as Goliath Light 1.5. >> >>----------------------------------------------------- >> >>The Goliath Light had no permission to start. >> >>----------------------------------------------------- >> >>Goliath Blitz will play the CCT4. >> >>volker > >I don't agree that engines that have "little" in common should be considered >unique entries if they are written by the same people or members of the same >team. > >For example, Fritz is rewritten by Frans Morsch each time he makes a new >version. One may assume that if he is rewriting it, he's changing approximately >everything. It would not be appropriate to allow each of these to play as a >unique entry. > >One programmer, one entrant. And if there are two or more people on the team, >that counts as one programmer. > >My humble opinion. > >bruce This is probably a language issue. As a German I can't think of any clearer way to put it than Michael did. 1.) He stated that one of the entries wasn't done by him or with his permission ! The way this fact was highlighted is extremely graphical for a German mind :). 2.) He explained what the two versions of his program are about as a sidenode.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.