Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 17:26:28 06/16/98
Go up one level in this thread
On June 16, 1998 at 19:19:02, Ed Schröder wrote: >>Posted by Enrique Irazoqui on June 16, 1998 at 18:06:16: > >>>>Is it true that Rebel 9 has to save its games in order for any book >>>>learning to take place? > >>>No, this is not true. > >>It is not true that in the SSDF match Rebel 9 lost several games >>against Fritz 5 on the same opening lines because it couldn't save its >>games and therefore it couldn't learn? I understood this is what you >>had said. > >Nope that's not what I have said, I said that the ChessBase autoplayer >COULD harm Rebel because it doesn't save the game. The same applies >for this w-b-w behavior which might disturb the Rebel learner. Either for not saving games or because of the w-b-w sequence, the fact is that R9 lost several double games against F5 in the SSDF match, which means its learner DID NOT work as usual. Rebel 9 has never lost double games this way in any other matches I have seen or played. Enrique >But since the thing is not public how can I check? > >And if the Chessbase autoplayer harms Rebel would I not have at least >the right to investigate that? > >Apparently all this is not possible so I am out. I like to compete but >it should be open and above board. > >- Ed - > > > >>Enrique
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.