Author: Mark Young
Date: 22:09:37 06/16/98
Go up one level in this thread
On June 16, 1998 at 16:57:19, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >On June 15, 1998 at 17:34:31, Mark Young wrote: > >>On June 15, 1998 at 16:20:32, Moritz Berger wrote: >> >>>On June 15, 1998 at 15:49:04, Thorsten Czub wrote: >>> >>>>What is Vincents sin ? >>>>Why moderation ? >>>>he has an opinion and he tells us his opinion. >>>> >>>>All I see moritz is that you call him a liar by saying he lies ! >>>>THIS is a case for moderation. But not Vincent telling us his opinion about >>>>opening books. >>>> >>>>Isn't this not allowed because it is AGAINST fritz ? >>>>But it would be allowed if it is against rebel ? >>> >>>I protested against both his attacks on Rebel and Fritz. >>>Facts are facts are facts. >>> >> >>I don’t think attacks on a program should carry the same weight as attacks on a >>person. Even if the attacks seem to come out of left field. This is a computer >>chess group and if someone has something to say about a program good or bad, >>they should be able to say it. As long as it does not get out of hand. >> >>>>I have bought fritz5. Am I allowed to comment on fritz5. Or is only somebody >>>>allowed to say something who has the magic-autoplayer from ChessBase ? >>>>I see no case of moderation here. But - we see again how different >>>>people evaluate this. >>>>Good that I don't have to decide. > >You don't see it right? > Sorry that was more of a general comment. I was not really commenting on your post. I see nothing wrong with the way you posted. >I'm not attacking Rebel for making the killerbook, i'm not even attacking >rebel. It's clear that it won from Diep this match. I just want YOU the audience >to know that book cooking is happening, and that the rebel book was again >a reaction on the killing cg5 book (cg5 book kills especially rebel8 book). > >Vincent.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.