Author: Slater Wold
Date: 23:08:59 01/15/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 16, 2002 at 02:03:52, pavel wrote: >what does it prove? >one is in depth 21 (IDE) the other one is in depth 22 (SCSI) > >in the same depth with SCSI, junior took 2:20 time It failed high (solving the problem) 4 seconds quicker on the SCSI drive. Also, if you do the math, the TB hits are far better. On most runs, somewhere close to 10% better. > >> -+ (-3.21) Depth: 21 00:02:20 198715kN, tb=99381 >>92...Ke3 93.Bf4+ Kd3 94.Bxg3 Rxg3 95.Kf2 Re3 96.Rf4 Nd2 97.Kg2 Re2+ 98.Kh3 Ke3 >>99.Rg4 Ne4 100.Rg1 Rb2 101.Rg7 Kxd4 > >& with IDE it took, > > > -+ (-3.20) Depth: 21 00:02:57 223520kN, tb=117623 >>92...Ke3 93.Bf4+ Kd3 94.Bxg3 Rxg3 95.Kf2 Re3 96.Rf4 Nd2 97.Kg2 Re2+ 98.Kh3 Kc4 >>99.Kg3 Ne4+ 100.Kg4 Kxd4 101.Rf3 > > >the pv, tb hits, nodes, or not even the score is the same. > >I don't get it. > >maybe I am missing something? > >I use IDE, how much differance is speed (and eventually in performance) can i >expect? > > >regards, >pavs
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.