Author: pavel
Date: 23:36:49 01/15/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 16, 2002 at 02:30:40, Dann Corbit wrote: >On January 16, 2002 at 02:23:44, pavel wrote: > >>>Benny Antonsson proposed this position: >>>[D]r1bqk1nr/pppp1p1p/2n3p1/1B6/1b1NP3/2P5/PP3PPP/RNBQK2R b KQkq - 0 1 >>> >>>Which has the well known response Bg7 (played almost 100% since the 1800's). >> >> >>Be7 you mean? > >It seems I have been analyzing the entirely wrong position altogether (which was >this one): this is what shredder6 has to say. 1...Nxd4 2.Qxd4 ± (0.97) depth: 1/2 00:00:01 1...Nxd4 2.Qxd4 ± (0.97) depth: 1/2 00:00:01 1...Bc5 2.Nxc6 dxc6 ± (0.84) depth: 1/2 00:00:01 1...Bc5 2.Bxc6 bxc6 ² (0.44) depth: 1/2 00:00:01 1...Bc5 2.Nxc6 bxc6 ² (0.35) depth: 1/2 00:00:01 1...Bc5 2.0-0 ± (0.92) depth: 2/4 00:00:01 1...Bc5 2.0-0 ± (1.40) depth: 2/4 00:00:01 1...Bc5 2.Nxc6 bxc6 3.Qd4 ± (1.14) depth: 3/6 00:00:01 1...Bc5 2.0-0 Nf6 ± (0.89) depth: 3/6 00:00:01 1...Bd6 2.Qg4 Nxd4 3.Qxd7+ Bxd7 ± (0.88) depth: 3/6 00:00:01 1...Bd6 2.0-0 Qh4 ± (0.83) depth: 3/6 00:00:01 1...Bd6 2.0-0 Qh4 3.f4 Nxd4 4.Qxd4 Qxf4 ± (1.08) depth: 4/8 00:00:01 1...Bd6 2.0-0 Nxd4 3.Qxd4 Qh4 +- (1.45) depth: 4/8 00:00:01 1...Bc5 2.Bxc6 bxc6 3.0-0 +- (1.44) depth: 4/8 00:00:01 1...Bc5 2.Nxc6 bxc6 3.f4 ± (1.09) depth: 4/8 00:00:01 1...Bc5 2.0-0 Nb4 3.cxb4 Bxd4 ± (1.09) depth: 4/8 00:00:01 1...Bc5 2.0-0 Qh4 3.f3 Nf6 ± (1.07) depth: 5/10 00:00:01 1...Bc5 2.Nb3 Bb6 3.0-0 Nf6 4.Bg5 ± (1.23) depth: 6/12 00:00:01 1...Bc5 2.Nb3 Bb6 3.Bxc6 bxc6 4.Be3 ± (0.98) depth: 7/14 00:00:01 66kN 1...Bc5 2.0-0 Nf6 3.Bg5 Nxd4 4.cxd4 Bb6 5.Bxf6 Qxf6 ± (0.98) depth: 7/14 00:00:01 79kN 1...Bd6 2.0-0 Nf6 3.f3 0-0 4.Na3 Bxa3 5.bxa3 ± (0.97) depth: 7/14 00:00:01 108kN 1...Bd6 2.0-0 Nf6 3.f3 0-0 4.Bh6 Re8 5.Bxc6 dxc6 ± (0.89) depth: 7/14 00:00:01 123kN 1...Bd6 2.0-0 Nf6 3.f3 0-0 4.Bh6 Nxd4 5.cxd4 Re8 ± (1.03) depth: 8/16 00:00:02 211kN 1...Bc5 2.0-0 Nf6 3.Bg5 0-0 4.Bxc6 dxc6 5.f3 ± (1.02) depth: 8/16 00:00:02 296kN 1...Bc5 2.0-0 Nf6 3.e5 Nxd4 4.cxd4 Qe7 ± (1.02) depth: 8/16 00:00:02 316kN 1...Bc5 2.0-0 Nf6 3.e5 Nxd4 4.cxd4 Bxd4 5.exf6 Qxf6 ± (1.27) depth: 9/18 00:00:03 415kN 1...Bc5 2.0-0 Nf6 3.e5 Nh5 4.Nb3 Bb6 5.Bxc6 bxc6 6.Bh6 ± (1.31) depth: 9/18 00:00:03 517kN 1...Bd6 2.0-0 Nf6 3.f3 0-0 4.Bxc6 dxc6 5.Ne6 ± (1.30) depth: 9/18 00:00:04 548kN 1...Bd6 2.0-0 Nf6 3.f3 0-0 4.Bh6 Re8 5.Bc4 Bc5 ± (0.96) depth: 9/18 00:00:04 664kN 1...Bd6 2.0-0 Nf6 3.Re1 0-0 4.Bxc6 dxc6 5.e5 Bd7 6.exf6 Qxf6 ± (1.21) depth: 10/20 00:00:06 1039kN 1...Bd6 2.0-0 a6 3.Bd3 Nf6 4.Bh6 Ne5 5.g3 Bc5 ± (1.21) depth: 10/20 00:00:10 1714kN 1...Bd6 2.0-0 a6 3.Bd3 Qh4 4.Nf3 Qh5 5.h3 Ne5 6.Be2 Nxf3+ 7.Bxf3 Qe5 ± (1.38) depth: 11/22 00:00:15 2731kN 1...Bc5 2.0-0 Qe7 3.f3 Nf6 4.Bg5 Qe5 ± (1.37) depth: 11/22 00:00:25 4497kN 1...Bc5 2.0-0 Qe7 3.Bf4 Nf6 4.Bxc7 0-0 5.Nb3 d6 6.Nxc5 dxc5 ± (1.30) depth: 11/22 00:00:31 5513kN 1...Bc5 2.0-0 Qe7 3.e5 a6 4.Ba4 h5 5.Bf4 Qh4 6.Bg3 Qe4 +- (1.43) depth: 12/24 00:01:22 13399kN 1...Be7 2.0-0 a6 3.Ba4 Nf6 4.Bh6 b5 5.Nxc6 dxc6 6.Bc2 Bg4 7.f3 Bc5+ 8.Be3 +- (1.42) depth: 12/24 00:01:45 16743kN 1...Be7 2.0-0 a6 3.Bd3 Ne5 4.Bc2 d6 5.f4 Bd7 6.fxe5 +- (1.42) depth: 12/24 00:01:50 17446kN 1...Bf8 2.0-0 Nge7 3.Nxc6 Nxc6 4.Bxc6 bxc6 5.Be3 f6 6.f4 Ba6 +- (1.41) depth: 12/24 00:02:45 26578kN 1...Bf8 2.0-0 Nge7 3.Nxc6 Nxc6 4.Qd5 Bg7 5.Bg5 Ne7 6.Qc5 b6 7.Qb4 ± (1.15) depth: 12/24 00:03:35 35473kN 1...Bf8 2.0-0 Bg7 3.Nxc6 bxc6 4.Bc4 Ne7 5.Be3 0-0 6.Bd4 Rb8 7.Bxg7 ± (1.25) depth: 13/26 00:04:44 47027kN 1...Bf8 2.Nxc6 dxc6 3.Qxd8+ Kxd8 4.Be2 Be6 5.Be3 Bg7 6.0-0 Kc8 7.Rd1 Ne7 8.Nd2 Rd8 9.f4 ± (1.12) depth: 14/28 00:10:10 105134kN (Mahamood, home 16.01.2002)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.