Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 00:15:26 01/16/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 16, 2002 at 03:13:26, Dann Corbit wrote: >On January 16, 2002 at 02:36:49, pavel wrote: >[snip] >>1...Be7 2.0-0 a6 3.Ba4 Nf6 4.Bh6 b5 5.Nxc6 dxc6 6.Bc2 Bg4 7.f3 Bc5+ 8.Be3 >> +- (1.42) depth: 12/24 00:01:45 16743kN >>1...Be7 2.0-0 a6 3.Bd3 Ne5 4.Bc2 d6 5.f4 Bd7 6.fxe5 >> +- (1.42) depth: 12/24 00:01:50 17446kN >>1...Bf8 2.0-0 Nge7 3.Nxc6 Nxc6 4.Bxc6 bxc6 5.Be3 f6 6.f4 Ba6 >> +- (1.41) depth: 12/24 00:02:45 26578kN >>1...Bf8 2.0-0 Nge7 3.Nxc6 Nxc6 4.Qd5 Bg7 5.Bg5 Ne7 6.Qc5 b6 7.Qb4 >> ± (1.15) depth: 12/24 00:03:35 35473kN >>1...Bf8 2.0-0 Bg7 3.Nxc6 bxc6 4.Bc4 Ne7 5.Be3 0-0 6.Bd4 Rb8 7.Bxg7 >> ± (1.25) depth: 13/26 00:04:44 47027kN >>1...Bf8 2.Nxc6 dxc6 3.Qxd8+ Kxd8 4.Be2 Be6 5.Be3 Bg7 6.0-0 Kc8 7.Rd1 Ne7 8.Nd2 >>Rd8 9.f4 >> ± (1.12) depth: 14/28 00:10:10 105134kN > >Now that's tantalizing! It seems we have another novelty. > >Maybe Slater or someone else with a supreme machine can give it a stomping and >see what falls out of it. >[D]r1bqkbnr/pppp1p1p/2n3p1/1B6/3NP3/8/PPP2PPP/RNBQK2R b KQkq - bm Bg7 Bf8 Qe7; >c0 "Which is best?"; Oops. Must be a different position that you analyzed, since the bishop is already at f8? Or did I post the wrong position again. Augh. :-|
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.