Author: Tony Werten
Date: 02:30:57 01/16/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 16, 2002 at 02:08:59, Slater Wold wrote: >On January 16, 2002 at 02:03:52, pavel wrote: > >>what does it prove? >>one is in depth 21 (IDE) the other one is in depth 22 (SCSI) >> >>in the same depth with SCSI, junior took 2:20 time > >It failed high (solving the problem) 4 seconds quicker on the SCSI drive. > >Also, if you do the math, the TB hits are far better. On most runs, somewhere >close to 10% better. Something is wrong. On ply 21, the ide drive had 17% more egtb hits. (so it makes sence it's slower). They should be exactly the same in hitcount, so one of your egtb files is corrupt or missing. Tony > >> >>> -+ (-3.21) Depth: 21 00:02:20 198715kN, tb=99381 >>>92...Ke3 93.Bf4+ Kd3 94.Bxg3 Rxg3 95.Kf2 Re3 96.Rf4 Nd2 97.Kg2 Re2+ 98.Kh3 Ke3 >>>99.Rg4 Ne4 100.Rg1 Rb2 101.Rg7 Kxd4 >> >>& with IDE it took, >> >> > -+ (-3.20) Depth: 21 00:02:57 223520kN, tb=117623 >>>92...Ke3 93.Bf4+ Kd3 94.Bxg3 Rxg3 95.Kf2 Re3 96.Rf4 Nd2 97.Kg2 Re2+ 98.Kh3 Kc4 >>>99.Kg3 Ne4+ 100.Kg4 Kxd4 101.Rf3 >> >> >>the pv, tb hits, nodes, or not even the score is the same. >> >>I don't get it. >> >>maybe I am missing something? >> >>I use IDE, how much differance is speed (and eventually in performance) can i >>expect? >> >> >>regards, >>pavs
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.