Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 04:15:01 01/16/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 16, 2002 at 06:23:37, Graham Laight wrote: >1. Van Wely can practise against the commercial version > >2. Rebel is a single processor program > >However good the software, point 2 is a fundamental limitation. > >-g The subject states, "Ed Is Being Over Presumptious". Where did I claim a victory? Ed >On January 15, 2002 at 21:14:03, James Doby wrote: > >>Rebel is an Outstanding Program that makes very little "Computer like Moves" >>it's play is indistiquishable from human play. I can't see van wely >>outcalculating the thing or outplaying it in the endgame the best he can hope >>for is a drawn match perhaps a repeat of the Fritz Huebner match, ofcourse rebel >>is much stronger then fritz against humans as the grandmaster challenges >>demonstrated, look at fritz poor result in the israeli league.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.