Author: Slater Wold
Date: 06:11:36 01/16/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 16, 2002 at 05:30:57, Tony Werten wrote: >On January 16, 2002 at 02:08:59, Slater Wold wrote: > >>On January 16, 2002 at 02:03:52, pavel wrote: >> >>>what does it prove? >>>one is in depth 21 (IDE) the other one is in depth 22 (SCSI) >>> >>>in the same depth with SCSI, junior took 2:20 time >> >>It failed high (solving the problem) 4 seconds quicker on the SCSI drive. >> >>Also, if you do the math, the TB hits are far better. On most runs, somewhere >>close to 10% better. > >Something is wrong. On ply 21, the ide drive had 17% more egtb hits. (so it >makes sence it's slower). They should be exactly the same in hitcount, so one of >your egtb files is corrupt or missing. Not at all. Faster accessing to the TB's = getting more ply. 17% faster TB access = 17% faster to ply. With SCSI it took 2:20 to get to ply 21, while with IDE it took 2:57. Speeding up the search by 37 seconds. I don't have corrupt TB's, but of course the 6 man is not complete. They are not all available yet. > >Tony > >> >>> >>>> -+ (-3.21) Depth: 21 00:02:20 198715kN, tb=99381 >>>>92...Ke3 93.Bf4+ Kd3 94.Bxg3 Rxg3 95.Kf2 Re3 96.Rf4 Nd2 97.Kg2 Re2+ 98.Kh3 Ke3 >>>>99.Rg4 Ne4 100.Rg1 Rb2 101.Rg7 Kxd4 >>> >>>& with IDE it took, >>> >>> > -+ (-3.20) Depth: 21 00:02:57 223520kN, tb=117623 >>>>92...Ke3 93.Bf4+ Kd3 94.Bxg3 Rxg3 95.Kf2 Re3 96.Rf4 Nd2 97.Kg2 Re2+ 98.Kh3 Kc4 >>>>99.Kg3 Ne4+ 100.Kg4 Kxd4 101.Rf3 >>> >>> >>>the pv, tb hits, nodes, or not even the score is the same. >>> >>>I don't get it. >>> >>>maybe I am missing something? >>> >>>I use IDE, how much differance is speed (and eventually in performance) can i >>>expect? >>> >>> >>>regards, >>>pavs
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.