Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Mate in 17 === J.Halumbirek,1948

Author: José Antônio Fabiano Mendes

Date: 07:53:01 01/16/02

Go up one level in this thread

On January 16, 2002 at 10:49:44, Vincent Lejeune wrote:

>On January 16, 2002 at 10:45:50, José Antônio Fabiano Mendes wrote:
>
>> I saw this position in the CSS Forum [ http://www.computerschach.de/forum/ ],
>> the stipulation is "White to move and mate in 17",I have no way of knowing
>> if that is true or not,sorry. JAFM
>
>after some analysis with a friend it seems that white move and black mates !
 It could very well be that,I had not thought of this possibility,most
 likely you are right.Congrats! JAFM

• Re: Mate in 17 === J.Halumbirek,1948 Heiner Marxen 15:10:43 01/16/02
  • GUSTAV confirms Mate in 17 in 8:30 min on 1 Ghz AMD Michael Diosi 23:40:01 01/16/02
    • Alybadix, version 1996.2 also Michael Diosi 23:57:55 01/16/02
  • Re: Mate in 17 === J.Halumbirek,1948 (really: followed by #15) Heiner Marxen 16:46:25 01/16/02
    • Re: Mate in 17 === J.Halumbirek,1948 (really: followed by #15) Michael Diosi 23:37:21 01/16/02
      • Re: Mate in 17 === J.Halumbirek,1948 (corrected position) Heiner Marxen 06:49:28 01/17/02
        • Re: Mate in 17 === J.Halumbirek,1948 (corrected position) Roy Eassa 10:40:56 01/17/02
      • Re: Mate in 17 === J.Halumbirek,1948 (really: followed by #15) Vincent Lejeune 00:23:32 01/17/02
        • Wrong Position Michael Diosi 00:45:10 01/17/02
          • Re: Wrong Position José Antônio Fabiano Mendes 02:18:27 01/17/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.