Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 13:41:01 01/16/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 16, 2002 at 13:59:12, Dieter Buerssner wrote:
>On January 16, 2002 at 11:17:11, Matthew Barnett wrote:
>
>>[D]r6r/1b1n1pk1/p3p1pR/1p1pP1P1/2q2P2/P1N2B2/1PP4Q/2KR4 w - - 0 24
>>
>>Here, in a correspondence game, I played Nxd5 and went on to win. I'm trying to
>>work out how good it is against the other more obvious move, Rh1.
>
>Yace goes for yet another move - f5:
>
> 107654240 13:52.7 1.70 10t 24. Rh1 Rhg8 25. f5 gxf5H 26. g6H Kf8H 27.
> gxf7H Kxf7H 28. Rh7+H Ke8H 29. Qh5+H Kd8H {HT}
> {-80}
> 157185687 21:01.5 1.71 10t+ 24. f5 gxf5 25. Rh1 Rhg8 26. g6 Kf8 27. gxf7
> Kxf7 28. Rh7+ Kf8 29. Rxd7 Bc6 30. Qh6+ Rg7
> {260}
> 182164020 24:59.2 1.90 10t 24. f5 gxf5 25. Rh1 Rhg8 26. g6 Kf8 27. gxf7
> Rg5 28. Rxe6 Kxf7 29. Rd6 Ke8 {0}
> 184161054 25:16.5 1.90 10. 24. f5 gxf5 25. Rh1 Rhg8 26. g6 Kf8 27. gxf7
> Rg5 28. Rxe6 Kxf7 29. Rd6 Ke8 {0}
> 229707428 32:14.1 2.30 11++ 24. f5 gxf5 25. Rh1 Rhg8 26. g6 Kf8 27. gxf7
> Rg5 28. Rxe6 Kxf7 29. Rd6 Ke8 30. Qh8+ Kf7 31.
> Rxd7+ Ke6 {340}
>
>I stopped here, fail high was not resolved
>
>After doing few moves after f5 and going back, the score is rather convincing:
>
> 1283320 11.796 5.27 11u. 24. f5 exf5 25. Nxd5 Bxd5 26. Bxd5 Qg4 27.
> Rg1 {HT} {10}
>
>After 25...gxf5 I go a similar score.
I think your line above is probably just a transposition of the Nxd5 idea (just
like the f5 move is a simple transposition for the Rh1 idea).
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.