Author: Benny Antonsson
Date: 15:20:52 01/16/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 16, 2002 at 12:56:16, Severi Salminen wrote: >>I just wanted to say that with the sparse (no offence) implementations in > >How do you know that :) Yes, the evaluation function is simple, but the search >is not _that_ simple... It is true, though, that my "philosophy" is to make >everything as simple and elegant as possible. If I can live without programming >an exception, I won't program it. But surely I will improve the evaluation, but >other things come first. I don't really _know_ this, but I assume it after reading your homepage. > >>Requiem, it playes very good chess, especially faster games. However, It hurt my >>hart when I see it has a superior position, leading by 6-7 pawns or so, and then >>draws due to threefolded repetition :(. Will this be fixed in the next version ? > >I try to fix it but I have decided to implement is the same time as hash tables >and for some reason I want to finish all the other things first... But it is >frustrating when Requiem draws in clearly won positions but at least they are >clearly won positions :) > >Severi
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.