Author: Bas Hamstra
Date: 16:34:08 01/16/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 16, 2002 at 14:21:14, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On January 16, 2002 at 05:55:11, Bas Hamstra wrote: > >>On January 16, 2002 at 05:00:48, Ed Schröder wrote: >> >>>On January 14, 2002 at 22:59:00, jefkaan wrote: >>> >>>>On January 14, 2002 at 19:17:02, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>i see bookbuilder in cct4. that is an interface made by >>>>>Bas Hamstra sold to J.E.F. Kaan >>>> >>>>bullshit, bookbuilder is my handle on ICC, >>>>based on a program which i indeed invented >>>>to analyze chess openings. >>> >>>I found this in one of your README files: >>> >>> programming (up till version 3.2 by Bas Hamstra), >>> ideas, testing,evaluation, & further development by K.E.C, >>> The Netherlands, further programming (3.8 etc.Michel Langeveld). >>> >>>Maybe you can elaborate a bit about the origin of Bookbuilder? >>> >>>About Djenghis, when did you start programming Djenghis? Maybe you can tell us a >>>bit about your program? Type of search, q-search, hash tables etc. In other >>>words write some convincing stuff Djenghis is yours and yours alone and not >>>another clone, post some results of test positions or whatever, because I think >>>in the current situation it is advisable to purify your name. >>> >>>Ed >> >>Ridiculous... Now he is *advided* by a moderator to defend himself in public >>against an personal attack without evidence. I clearly smell suspicion from you >>here and that is *bad*. >> >>Tell me why you allow this? The guy has a 1800 program. Now if he gets a top 5 >>result in ICCCT4, T H E N ask questions. Not now. > >_ABSOLUTELY_ _NOT_. > >That is _the_ wrong way to handle this. IE "wait and see." If the entry is >phony then the _entire_ tournament is affected and the results are clearly >tainted. So what? It's just another clone participating. One out of 50. It's nothing compared to a beginning programmer being discredited and asked to do an exam in public, based on "he cannot program" and an account he used with YACE. >Participant problems must be resolved _prior_ to the start. not _after_ >it is over. By then it is too late... >Asking someone to explain some internal details about their program is not >"out of bounds". Again, at ICCA events this is required on the entry form >_anyway_. No problem. But being asked to do an exam in public based on a false accusation is still scandalous. Bas. >The more information that is available, the better things are...
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.