Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 18:58:00 01/16/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 16, 2002 at 21:39:08, Terry McCracken wrote: >Why? Taking this personally is silly. It's not on the personal level. If someone posts 'program x is better than program y' based on the result of a few games, I get annoyed too. I'm just a grumpy person sometimes. >Your second post is another example of this: '...unwilling to concede >>the point'. Of course he not going to concede. He's arguing the >>opposite! You'll have to rebuke his points, not his willingness to >>state them. >> > >No I don't, I believe Ed Schroder rebuked Bruce's point convincingly. > Just because you believe so doesn't mean he has to agree. In fact, he most likely will not. If discussing something were always as simple as to give one counterargument, the amount of posts here would be reduced by at least 50%. Postings things which boil down to : 'you just can't admit you're wrong' is bad, don't do it. It brings nothing to the discussion and it's just annoying. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.